June 2025

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15 161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Active Entries

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Thursday, December 3rd, 2009 05:39 pm
A TUC study, ‘Decent pensions for all’, finds taxpayers are spending twice as much on private sector fat cat pensions than on public sector pensions. Taxpayers are paying £2.50 to subsidise the pensions of the richest 1% of the population for every £1 spent on paying pensions to retired public servants.
Tags:
Thursday, December 3rd, 2009 06:17 pm (UTC)
They make a very good point. Why are we having higher-rate tax relief on pensions? Standard, yes, but higher rate?
Thursday, December 3rd, 2009 06:38 pm (UTC)
Off the top of my head: It is the nature of any money-based system that everyone pays in some measure for everyone1 else. The first "everyone" always means everyone; the value of the second "everyone1" varies according to the particular system involved, but it's always the goal of those in that group to keep it as small as possible, because that means they get more each. The ideal of socialism is that the second "everyone1" equals the first "everyone", but nobody's made that work yet as far as I know.

In other words, it's never a case of whether you have socialism, just of how much and who benefits; the people who need it, or the ones at the top who don't.
Thursday, December 3rd, 2009 07:31 pm (UTC)
Hmmm I get higher rate relief for my pension. Except right now I'm not getting paid, so no pension. I'm not in the richest 1% mind you....